top of page

Andrew Bailey

Andrew was admitted as a solicitor in 2002 in Queensland and in 2003 in New South Wales, with his name included on the High Court roll in August 2002.  He was subsequently admitted to practice in New South Wales in July 2003.

 

Andrew practises primarily in commercial disputes and general equity matters with experience in bankruptcy/insolvency and construction litigation.  Andrew also accepts instructions in wills and estates litigation – in contested probate and family provisio

n proceedings.  As an adjunct to his equity practice, Andrew takes instructions to appear and to advise in relation to legal costs disputes.

 

In previous years, Andrew has lectured for the College of Law.  He also writes on a variety of topics for the Law Society Journal and he frequently presents as part of CPD programmes for the Law Society, for Legalwise and at other privately arranged conferences.



Practice Areas

Bankruptcy & Insolvency
Commercial Law
Equity
Legal Costs
Wills & Estates

Notable Cases

Appellate

Mandalinic v Stone (Liquidator) [2023] FCAFC 146 – for the successful liquidator on an appeal concerning an issue determined summarily that a director cannot file an affidavit in separate recovery proceedings (involving recovery of a penalty following DPN served which itself is based on an estimate) to revoke the liability (with J Baird).

Stokes v Toyne [2023] NSWCA 59 (4 April 2023) – unsuccessful respondent – Anshun estoppel – abuse of process – whether subsequent damages claim could have been brought in proceedings for the recovery of deposit under s. 55(2A) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) (with M Castle).

203 Castlereagh St Pty Ltd v Skybloo Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 172 – practice and procedure – requirements for an order to be made dispensing with a hearing and proceeding to determine matter on the papers pursuant to s.50 of the Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.

eInduct Systems Pty Ltd v 3D Safety Services Pty Ltd & Ors. (2015) 90 NSWLR 451, [2015] NSWCA 284 – for successful respondent in supervisory jurisdiction – review after appeal from Legal Profession Act costs assessment and review of ordered costs – “costs indemnity principle” “proportionality” “refusal to grant leave to amend summons on appeal” (with M. Castle).

Instructed in appeals to a single judge from a decision of an inferior court, tribunal or other body.

Instructed in respect of costs assessment and other costs appeals.

First instance

Commercial & Equity

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Ijaz Ahmad Rana [2023] NSWDC – for Defendant, where recoveries sought against person named director of company in liquidation pursuant to director penalty notice, specific available defence identified and raised (resolution on terms without need for hearing).
Barnden v Zulian; Barnden v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] NSWSC 1980 – application for further security for costs against liquidator where order made reserving liberty to apply (with Assaf SC)

Bock v Lawrence Dry Cleaners Pty Ltd & Rodrigues [2017] NSWLC (Small Claims) – for successful defendant (bridal boutique owner) – bridal gown manufactured in USA and displayed before imported to Australia for display – ‘second hand’ in sense described in LR McLean & Co Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1994] 3 NZLR 33 and a care label was not required to be attached.

Instructed previously for a Defendant in proceedings in the Equity Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales seeking recovery of monies on particular identified bases and remedies of various types including unwinding transactions and equitable compensation.

Instructions in respect of conveyancing matters.

Instructed previously in recovery matters on behalf of a large federal government agency.

Instructions in construction litigation, including applications under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).

Bankruptcy / Insolvency

Poon v Proctor Phair Lawyers Pty Ltd [2024] FedCFamC2G 291 – for successful respondent on review of Registrar’s decision following successfully resisting an application to set aside a bankruptcy notice.
In the matter of One Mastery Developments Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 980 (18 Aug 2023) – for respondent on unsuccessful application for leave pursuant to s. 459S of the Corporations Act 2001 – succeeded in establishing serious question to be tried but failed given insufficiency of explanation by director as to arrangements to ensure creditor’s statutory demand received by post.

Doyle v Lewis [2023] FedCFamC2G 205 (17 Mar 2023) – for successful respondent on application to set aside bankruptcy notice given underlying liability judgments for damages together with gross sum costs, where no appeal brought against those decisions within time prescribed by UCPR but foreshadowed on basis of contest as to civil liability and as to criminal convictions unsuccessfully appeal from following criminal trial, which was relied upon, in part, in the civil proceedings

ICAC v Obeid & Ors [2022] FCA – creditors petition in respect of $1.6 million arising from gross sum costs orders and interest following specific Supreme Court proceedings – resolved without need for a hearing, together with claims in respect of other liabilities owing to the State of New South Wales together totalling $5.25 million on terms including permitting publication of details (with M. Castle)

Instructed previously for Plaintiffs and Defendants in applications to set aside creditor’s statutory demands.

Instructed previously in preference claims.

Instructed previously in bankruptcy examinations.

Wills & Estates

Alexiou v Alexiou [2024] NSWSC 1340 – for two beneficiaries where plaintiff and executor had agreed to separate representation for particular reasons – issue of jurisdiction exercised to control what practitioners charged their clients and what was recovered from a deceased estate by applicant, estate and beneficiaries.

Estate of Maria Zbrozek; Katarzyna (aka Kasia) Duszyk v Charles Emmanuel Morgan – Interim Administrator of the Estate of the late Maria Zbrozek [2020] NSWSC 1591 – in respect of a number of applications made inter partes in those proceedings (with M. Evans)

Instructed previously for plaintiffs and defendants in applications for further provision from deceased estates and in contested probate matters, including recently: -
• Probate of a missing Will (lost, assumed destroyed), resolved at mediation.
• Family provision proceedings for Plaintiff daughter where de facto spouse and deceased said to have separated prior to death (in the sense described in Squire v Squire [2019] NSWCA 90, and related authorities).
• Proceedings concerning various types of eligible person.

Advice to potential applicants concerning family provision claims being considered.
Advice concerning revival of a previously revoked Will – relying on parts of Slack v Rogan & Anor; Palffy v Rogan & Anor. [2013] NSWSC 522.

Advice concerning notional estate orders potentially sought where a person wished to dispose of a number of properties in a particular way in favour of children by series of inter vivos transactions.
Advice to person seeking to unwind a settlement of family provision and related proceedings resolved in a mediation on a particular basis.

Costs

Read v Solve Legal Pty Ltd [2025] NSWDC (unreported, Waugh SC DCJ) – appeal from review panel affirmation of assessor’s determination – costs assessors can assess costs pursuant to Notice of Discontinuance with term for payment of costs.

Go to Court Lawyers Pty Ltd v Caroline Fagan-Danzer [2023] NSWDC – recovery proceedings adjourned for costs assessor to assess costs – part of claim for costs was for work of former law practice purchased by successor – costs assessor declines to assess – client seeks summary dismissal in the face of the costs assessor’s determination given non-disclosure issue – issue as to characterisation of retainers as novated or assigned and consequences – law practice subsequent application to assess declined by the Manager, Costs Assessments – that decision the subject of separate judicial review proceedings – adjournment application sought by law practice – proceedings resolve on terms without need for hearing.

Issa v Joel [2021] NSWDC, unreported – for successful appellant – appeal from review panel decision where they had material before them but failed to make finding of full payment of invoices and found legal practitioner entitled to substitute last invoice – submission on appeal that law on bills issued applies only between solicitor and client, rejected.

Publications

Construction law

Bailey, A. “Rectification vs diminution: NSWCA clarifies consumer law damages” [in the construction law context], LSJ Online, 28 Nov 2025.
Bailey, A. “Building and construction industry gets a new look security of payment regime”, Law Society Journal, Issue 61, November 2019, pg 76.
Bailey, A. “Amended security of payment regime set to bring more clarity to building and construction disputes”, Law Society Journal, Issue 53, March 2019, p.82.

Legal practice related

Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Rewind: 2021 in costs”, Law Society Journal, February 2022.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “The pitfalls of pursuing bankruptcy on the basis of assessed costs”, Law Society Journal, August 2021.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “The law of costs: 2020 year in review”, Law Society Journal, December 2020.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “The costs of law: a look back at the stand-out cases of 2019”, Law Society Journal, Issue 62, December 2019, p 70.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Chorley abolished! High Court has final say”, Law Society Journal, Issue 60, October 2019, p 68.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Reflecting on a costly year: key themes and future predictions”, Law Society Journal, Issue 51, December 2018, p.72
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Limitation issues in solicitor/client costs”, Law Society Journal, Issue 50, November 2018, p.80.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Taking security for legal costs: lessons from Malouf v Constantinou”, Law Society Journal, Issue 48, September 2018, p.90.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Getting in on the ‘fruits of the action’: the power of the equitable lien”, Law Society Journal, Issue 47, August 2018, p.80.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “You really got a hold on me… the power of the solicitor’s lien”, Law Society Journal, Issue 46, July 2018, p.86.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “A practical guide to lump sum costs orders”, Law Society Journal, Issue 45, June 2018, p.82.
Castle, M., & Bailey, A. “To sue or not to sue? That is the question”, Law Society Journal, Issue 44, May 2018, p.83.
Castle, M., Bailey, A. & Rosati, K. "Legal costs: grappling with the complexities in the Legal Profession Uniform Law", Law Society Journal, Issue 43, April 2018, p.80.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Solicitor estopped from claiming fees: how did that happen?", Law Society Journal, Issue 25, August 2016, p.78.
Johnson, J., Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “The Chorley Exception: Three Strikes and Out?", Law Society Journal, Issue 24, July 2016, p.80.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Yours, Mine or Ours? Access to a solicitor's file when a retainer ends”, Law Society Journal, Issue 23, June 2016, p 88.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Consequences of inaccurate costs estimates and negligently performed work", Law Society Journal, Issue 22, May 2016, p84.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Costs Assessments: Unravelling the mysteries of certificate judgments”, Law Society Journal, Issue 18, December 2015, p 94.
Castle, M. & Bailey, A. “Costs Assessments: Recent cases in the Court of Appeal”, Law Society Journal, Issue 17, November 2015, p84.

bottom of page